Defense attorneys for Cole Allen, the man accused of attempting to assassinate President Trump at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, have filed a motion seeking to disqualify senior Justice Department officials from prosecuting the case on grounds that they were present during the incident and may be considered victims themselves.
The motion, filed Thursday evening, specifically requests the removal of U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro and acting Attorney General Todd Blanche from the case. The filing opens with a statement from FBI Director Kash Patel, who appeared at a press conference two days following the shooting. “This one hits a little differently. We were all there,” Patel stated at the time.
Allen, thirty-one years old, faces charges of attempting to assassinate the President, assaulting a federal officer with a deadly weapon, and two firearms violations. He has not yet entered a plea in the matter.
The defense team’s argument centers on what they characterize as an inherent conflict of interest. Federal prosecutors have alleged that Allen intended to kill “high-ranking government officials,” a description that could reasonably apply to both Blanche and Pirro. The attorneys note that Pirro maintains a longstanding personal friendship with President Trump, which they argue further complicates her role as prosecutor.
In their filing, defense counsel pointed to public statements made by Pirro in which she described herself as a potential victim of the attack. During one media appearance, she referred to being “in that combat zone” while discussing her experience in the ballroom during the incident.
The motion cites internal Justice Department regulations that require employees to recuse themselves from criminal investigations where conflicts of interest exist or where they maintain personal relationships with individuals involved in the case.
“As this case proceeds closer to trial, the country and the world will continue to wonder—how can the American justice system permit a victim to prosecute a criminal defendant in a case involving them?” the defense attorneys wrote. “Or even—how can one of the victim’s closest friends prosecute the alleged perpetrator of the offense?”
The Justice Department has not yet responded to requests for comment on the motion.
According to prosecutors, Allen sprinted through a security checkpoint one floor above the correspondents’ dinner while armed with a handgun, a shotgun, and several knives. Authorities allege he fired his shotgun at a security officer, striking the officer’s protective vest. The officer returned fire five times but did not hit Allen before he was taken into custody.
Investigators have revealed that Allen allegedly sent an email to family members on the evening of the dinner in which he outlined plans to target Trump administration officials beyond Director Patel, “prioritized from highest-ranking to lowest.”
The annual White House Correspondents’ Dinner drew a significant gathering of administration figures this year, including President Trump, numerous Cabinet members, and other senior federal officials.
The case raises significant questions about prosecutorial impartiality when those responsible for seeking justice may themselves be victims of the alleged crime. As this matter moves through the judicial system, the court will need to weigh whether the appearance of justice requires new leadership in the prosecution, or whether existing safeguards within the Justice Department are sufficient to ensure a fair trial.
Related: White House Pharmaceutical Negotiations Yield Limited Relief for American Consumers
