According to The Washington Post, a proposal to reduce the Department of Veterans Affairs’ workforce by 15% has resulted in plummeting morale among the agency’s staff. This would necessitate the layoffs of approximately 83,000 employees, although VA Secretary Doug Collins assures that frontline health care providers and claims processors will be exempt.
It has been reported that several employees have opted for early retirement, with a prevailing sentiment that such a move was inevitable due to the looming layoffs. The Washington Post reports an atmosphere of uncertainty and unease within the VA, with one individual stating that veterans are now checking in on the staff members.
Turning now to the broader implications, VA spokesperson Peter Kasperowicz has dismissed these concerns, highlighting other issues under the current administration that he claims have been overlooked by the media. He cites unresolved problems such as benefits backlogs, increasing healthcare wait times, and significant issues with survivor benefits.

The proposed cuts would significantly impact the agency’s central office, which accommodates 19,000 employees from the Veterans Health Administration, the Veterans Benefits Administration, and the National Cemetery System. In addition, consideration is being given to the consolidation of duplicate offices to further reduce staff numbers.
Both sides of this issue present compelling arguments. Advocacy groups for veterans have voiced concerns that these cuts could detrimentally affect veterans who rely on the VA for medical care. It is also noteworthy that veterans themselves constitute a quarter of the agency’s workforce. The PACT Act, which broadened benefits for veterans exposed to toxins like burn pits, has increased disability claims but has also facilitated the agency reaching new milestones in claims processing speed.
The situation is encapsulated by a veteran and VA communications worker, who reportedly told Hill staffers, “Iraq felt safer than being a VA employee currently does.” This raises important questions about the morale and well-being of those serving our veterans, and the significance of this should not be overlooked.
The evidence suggests that these cuts may have far-reaching consequences for the VA’s operations and for those who rely on its services.