President Donald Trump’s legal team has filed a comprehensive 111-page appeal with the New York Supreme Court’s Appellate Division, demanding the complete dismissal of the criminal conviction obtained by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg earlier this year.
The appeal, filed late Monday evening, represents the president’s most forceful legal challenge yet to what his attorneys characterize as an unprecedented prosecution driven by political motivations rather than legal merit.
Sullivan & Cromwell attorney Robert J. Giuffra Jr., representing the president in this matter, opened the filing with a stark assessment: “This is the most politically charged prosecution in our Nation’s history.”
The legal brief argues that after years of investigation into what it terms “decade-old, baseless allegations,” the Manhattan district attorney’s office manufactured felony charges against a sitting president under intense political pressure. The filing emphasizes that these charges emerged during a contentious presidential election in which Trump served as the leading Republican candidate.
Trump was convicted in May on 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree following a six-week trial. He had pleaded not guilty to all charges. The case currently remains on hold until 2029, though the president’s legal team seeks immediate dismissal rather than mere delay.
The appeal challenges the fundamental legal framework of the prosecution. According to the filing, prosecutors “concocted a purported felony by stacking time-barred misdemeanors under a convoluted legal theory” targeting conduct that had never previously been found to violate New York law. The legal team further contends that the district attorney improperly obscured this theory until the charge conference, denying the defense adequate opportunity to prepare.
Central to the appeal is the Supreme Court’s recent immunity decision, which Trump’s attorneys argue mandates immediate dismissal. The filing asserts that the high court’s historic ruling on presidential immunity, combined with both federal and New York state constitutional provisions, provides clear grounds for overturning the verdict.
A spokesman for the president’s legal team stated that the appeal demonstrates Trump’s continued commitment to ending what he terms politically motivated prosecutions. The spokesman indicated that the president remains focused on his administrative duties while his legal team pursues every available avenue to challenge the conviction.
The timing of this appeal carries particular significance. With the case currently stayed until the end of the decade, Trump’s legal strategy appears aimed at achieving complete exoneration rather than accepting a delayed resolution. The comprehensive nature of the 111-page filing suggests the defense team intends to challenge every aspect of the prosecution’s case, from its theoretical foundations to its procedural execution.
The appeal argues that the case “should never have seen the inside of a courtroom,” reflecting the defense’s position that the charges themselves represent an improper exercise of prosecutorial discretion motivated by political considerations rather than legitimate law enforcement objectives.
As this legal battle continues through the appellate process, it stands as perhaps the most significant test of presidential immunity and prosecutorial limits in modern American history. The outcome will likely establish precedents that extend far beyond this particular case, potentially reshaping the boundaries of criminal prosecution involving current and former presidents.
Related: Two California Democrats Keep Door Open for Next White House Bid
