A prominent television personality has ignited controversy with sweeping statements about American cuisine and the nation’s dependence on immigration, remarks that have drawn criticism for their dismissive tone toward American culture and contributions.
Padma Lakshmi, who arrived in the United States from India at age five and has built a career as a model and cooking show host, made the provocative claim that apple pie, long considered an iconic American dish, has no legitimate claim to American identity. In an interview promoting her new CBS cooking program, Lakshmi stated that apple pie “isn’t American: not the crust, not the filling, not the spices.”
Her comments extended beyond desserts. Lakshmi characterized native American foods including turkey, corn, cranberries, and blueberries as insufficient, suggesting that without imported ingredients and culinary traditions, Americans would be reduced to eating “desert packrat and ramps,” referring to a rodent species and wild garlic.
The television host’s remarks revealed what some observers have characterized as a transactional view of citizenship. “I love this country for what it gave me and my mom,” Lakshmi stated, before asserting that the United States would essentially cease functioning without continued immigration. “If you take away the immigrants, the country — the food system, the tech arena, Wall Street and medicine — will all come to a standstill,” she claimed.
These assertions come at a time when immigration policy remains a contentious issue for many Americans. Lakshmi’s specific reference to technology echoes ongoing debates about visa programs that allow foreign workers into American companies, programs that have faced increasing scrutiny from American professionals who question whether such arrangements truly serve the national interest.
The broader context of these remarks warrants examination. The United States, despite its relatively brief history of 249 years, has achieved technological, economic, and cultural accomplishments that have shaped the modern world. The suggestion that American achievement depends entirely upon continued immigration overlooks the innovation, industry, and determination that have characterized the American experience since the nation’s founding.
Critics have noted that Lakshmi’s comments arrive just two weeks before Thanksgiving, a holiday that celebrates both American abundance and the tradition of gratitude. The timing has struck many as particularly tone-deaf, given that Thanksgiving represents a uniquely American commemoration of harvest, community, and shared prosperity.
The controversy also highlights tensions that emerge when discussions of immigration shift from policy considerations to questions of cultural value and national identity. While America has long been enriched by diverse influences, the suggestion that American culture lacks inherent worth or that Americans themselves are somehow insufficient represents a departure from the traditional understanding of assimilation and citizenship.
Many immigrants and their descendants have chosen to embrace American identity fully, adopting not merely the opportunities America provides but also its values, traditions, and sense of shared purpose. This process of assimilation has historically strengthened both the newcomers and the nation itself.
As Americans prepare for Thanksgiving celebrations, Lakshmi’s remarks serve as a reminder that debates about immigration extend beyond economics and security to fundamental questions about what it means to be American and whether citizenship entails gratitude and respect for the nation that provides opportunity and freedom.
Related: Washington Homicides Challenge President’s Recent Claims of Safer Capital
