California’s primary election results remained undecided Thursday morning, with closely-watched races for governor and Los Angeles mayor still too close to call as election officials continue tabulating ballots across the state.

Republican Steve Hilton has emerged with a narrow lead in the gubernatorial race, capturing approximately 28 percent of votes counted thus far. Former Biden administration official Xavier Becerra follows in second place with 25 percent, while billionaire Tom Steyer holds 20 percent of the vote. The outcome will determine which two candidates advance to November’s general election.

Under California’s unique primary system, the top two vote-getters proceed to the general election regardless of party affiliation. This framework has occasionally produced November contests between candidates of the same political party, a scenario that remains possible depending on final vote tallies.

In Los Angeles, incumbent Mayor Karen Bass has secured her position in the November election, but the identity of her challenger remains uncertain. Spencer Pratt, an upstart candidate who entered the race as a political outsider, held second place Wednesday morning with 30 percent of the vote. Left-wing candidate Nithya Raman trails closely at 22 percent, with substantial numbers of ballots yet to be processed.

Pratt addressed supporters Wednesday evening, expressing confidence about his prospects in the general election should he advance. He characterized his candidacy as representing citizens across the political spectrum who seek improvements in basic quality of life issues. The candidate described himself as an Angeleno who decided the city’s trajectory demanded direct action from concerned residents.

The extended vote-counting process has drawn scrutiny from national political observers. California law permits mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if they arrive within several days of the election, a practice that extends the timeline for final results. Critics argue this system creates unnecessary uncertainty and delays in determining election outcomes.

The gubernatorial race carries significant implications for the nation’s most populous state, which has faced mounting challenges in recent years. Voters have expressed concerns about housing affordability, public safety, homelessness, and the cost of living. These issues dominated campaign discussions in the weeks leading to Tuesday’s primary.

Candidates made final appeals to voters throughout the preceding weekend, focusing particularly on Los Angeles, where the mayoral contest has highlighted divisions over how the city should address persistent urban challenges. The campaign has featured sharp disagreements about approaches to homelessness, public safety policy, and municipal governance.

Election officials indicated that complete results may not be available for several days as they process remaining mail-in ballots and verify provisional votes. California’s decentralized election administration system, with each county managing its own counting procedures, contributes to the extended timeline for final certification.

The races have attracted national attention as indicators of voter sentiment in a state that has long served as a bellwether for broader political trends. The outcomes will shape governance in California through the next several years and may influence policy debates extending well beyond state borders.

Related: Trump Administration Faces Lawsuit Over Nearly $1 Billion Wind Energy Settlement