Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has outlined an ambitious strategy to restore American control over critical industries that have fallen under Chinese dominance, characterizing the effort as nothing less than reclaiming national sovereignty.
In a detailed discussion with reporters at the Treasury Building’s historic Cash Room, Bessent articulated the administration’s determination to address what he termed America’s “inexcusable” vulnerability in sectors vital to national security and economic independence. The Secretary’s focus encompasses rare earth elements, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, steel production, and shipbuilding.
The framework, which Bessent describes as “de-risking, not decoupling” from China, represents a measured approach to unwinding decades of economic entanglement that has left the United States dependent on a strategic competitor for materials essential to modern defense systems, consumer electronics, and medical supplies.
The rare earth situation presents a particularly troubling case study. Bessent revealed that the technology underlying modern rare earth magnet production was developed by General Motors, an American company. That technology was subsequently sold to a Chinese firm under an agreement requiring the business to remain in the United States for five years. The moment that contractual obligation expired, the entire operation relocated to China.
“In a day, they moved it to China,” Bessent stated, illustrating the speed with which American technological advantages can be transferred abroad under current trade arrangements.
The problem has been compounded by what Bessent characterizes as predatory Chinese business practices. Whenever American companies attempt to establish rare earth processing facilities, Chinese competitors flood the market with below-cost products, making domestic production economically unviable. This pattern of dumping has effectively prevented the restoration of American rare earth capacity for years.
“The Chinese come in, they flood the market with unfair competition, and no administration has done anything about it,” the Treasury Secretary explained, pointing to a cycle of attempted American production followed by Chinese market manipulation that has repeated itself across multiple administrations.
The pharmaceutical sector presents similar concerns. American dependence on Chinese-manufactured medications and pharmaceutical precursors has created vulnerabilities that became starkly apparent during recent supply chain disruptions. The administration views this dependence as a matter of national security rather than merely economic policy.
Bessent’s strategy does not envision a complete severing of economic ties with China, which would likely prove both impractical and economically damaging. Instead, the “de-risking” approach seeks to identify sectors where American dependence creates unacceptable vulnerabilities and systematically rebuild domestic capacity in those areas.
The effort will require confronting the economic logic that led to offshoring in the first place. For decades, American policy makers embraced what Bessent termed “unfettered free trade,” prioritizing cost efficiency over strategic considerations. The current administration argues that this approach failed to account for the national security implications of allowing critical supply chains to migrate entirely offshore.
Whether the administration can successfully reverse decades of industrial migration remains to be seen. The challenge involves not merely building new facilities but creating economic conditions that allow them to remain competitive against subsidized foreign competition. That will require sustained policy commitment and potentially significant government support for strategic industries.
What appears certain is that the era of treating all trade relationships as purely economic matters has ended. The administration has concluded that sovereignty and security require a degree of economic independence, particularly in sectors that underpin military capability and public health.
Related: Bolsonaro Taken Into Custody Following Alleged Tampering With Electronic Monitoring Device
