Federal prosecutors filed charges Wednesday against three individuals in separate cases alleging fraud within Los Angeles homelessness programs, raising serious questions about how Washington oversees billions in taxpayer dollars intended to help Americans living on the streets.
The charges against Michael Young, 46, Lakiya Malone, 48, and Donye Mitchell, 55, detail allegations of misused taxpayer funds, including money purportedly spent on a nightclub and adjacent bingo hall, as well as bribes connected to fraudulent housing referrals. According to federal prosecutors, Los Angeles’ homelessness agency paid one of the suspect nonprofit organizations more than $75 million.
Representative Michael Cloud of Texas, speaking after a House Oversight hearing that examined federally funded homelessness programs in Los Angeles, Seattle, and other cities, characterized these cases as symptoms of a more fundamental problem in how the federal government allocates and monitors such spending.
“The only people really getting upward mobility in these programs, it would seem, is the people running the programs,” Cloud stated. “And that’s not really what the program’s supposed to be about.”
The congressman’s concern extends beyond the criminal allegations themselves. He argues that the current system rewards program activity and expenditure without adequately measuring whether these efforts achieve their stated purpose of moving people off the streets permanently.
Government agencies too often judge success by “how much money we send out the door” rather than whether the spending is “actually helping people” or whether proper safeguards exist to ensure taxpayer dollars reach their intended recipients, Cloud explained. He described the current framework as having been “incentivized for fraud.”
“We’ve got to take those incentives out and get back to making sure that all these programs have incentives for oversight and that the dollars are managed well,” he said.
Cloud suggested that some programs may actually perpetuate dependency rather than resolve it, creating a perverse incentive structure where program managers benefit from maintaining rather than reducing homelessness. In such arrangements, individuals remain “kind of in a cycle of dependency so that the program manager has job security, in a sense, and gets to live off the government dime.”
The congressman questioned why some Democratic-led jurisdictions appear resistant to implementing stronger oversight controls, pointing to Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass’ decision to step down from the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority commission as one example.
The issue extends beyond Los Angeles. Cloud referenced what has been termed the federal government’s “Housing First” philosophy, which generally prioritizes placing homeless individuals in housing as the primary intervention strategy.
These fraud cases arrive as the White House pushes Congress to adopt what officials describe as watershed reforms aimed at combating fraud across federal programs. The timing underscores growing bipartisan concern about accountability in government spending, particularly in programs designed to address complex social challenges.
The broader implications of these cases suggest a need for fundamental reform in how federal agencies structure, fund, and oversee programs intended to address homelessness. Without such changes, lawmakers warn, taxpayers may continue funding programs that enrich administrators while failing to achieve meaningful results for the vulnerable populations they were designed to serve.
Related: Hundreds Expected to Form Human Chain at Kennedy Center in Protest of Administration Changes
