X, Elon Musk’s social media platform, has gotten involved in the pending sale of Alex Jones Infowars, a conspiracy-theory website, to The Onion, a satirical paper.

In a Monday objection, X stated that its Terms of Service (TOS), prevent Jones’s X account from being sold without the company’s approval. The platform is not opposed to the other aspects of this sale.

Musk and President-elect Trump have developed a close relationship. Musk donated millions of dollars to his own pro-Trump super PAC, and Musk appeared on the campaign trails. Musk was named co-head of the new “Department of Government Efficiency” by Trump after the election. He has also been a regular presence at Mar-a-Lago.

The objection from X on Monday stated that “the Trustee seeks to violate X Corp. TOS by selling or otherwise transferring to a third-party the X Accounts, which neither Jones nor his bankruptcy estate are owners of.”

“While X Corp. does not take a position on the sale or use of any Content posted to the X Accounts by users, X Corp. owns the Services that are being sold in conjunction with the sale of X Accounts.”

Jones and his company filed bankruptcy protection after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting victim’s families sued Jones for defamation for his false claims that the shooting was a hoax. They won $1.5 billion.

Infowars, Jones’ right-wing conspiracy site, is also being liquidated.

The bankruptcy judge will decide whether or not to approve The Onion’s winning bid at an auction for Infowars assets. The judge announced Monday that he will hold a hearing to discuss the sale next month.

The First United American Companies, which operates a nutrition supplements site under Jones’s name, and made the other bid for the sale of the company, objects to the deal and alleges improper collusion.

Kyle Kimpler told the judge in Monday’s hearing, “You will hear the evidence, but you do not have to believe me.” It’s just a conspiracy theory. Nothing more.”

FUAC offered $3.5 million while The Onion only offered $1.75 in cash. The Sandy Hook families agreed to give up a portion of their payouts in the second offer. This meant that Jones’s creditors would get more.

The trustee insisted that his decision to select the bid as best was based on his sound business judgment. He described the objection as “a disappointed bidder’s improper attempt to interfere with an otherwise fair and transparent auction process.”

“We’ll hold an evidentiary proceeding where the parties can present their case and then we’ll decide what happens. I don’t want to prejudge anything,” U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez said during Monday’s hearing.