Okay, so here’s the thing about the recent passing of Pope Francis. There’s this narrative being spun by the left that seems to ignore the logical fallacy of attributing an unprecedented turnout of mourners to a supposed universal love for the Pope’s progressive outlook.

The narrative revolves around the image of thousands of mourners lining up to see Pope Francis lying in state inside St. Peter’s Basilica. The Vatican, due to higher-than-expected turnout, kept the doors open all night, offering but a fleeting respite for cleaning. Statistically speaking, over 50,000 people paid their respects during the first 12 hours of the public viewing. But let’s not hastily equate quantity with quality of sentiment.

Among the first-day mourners were people from all walks of life. A church group of teenagers, an Italian family with small children, and a woman praying for a successful operation, all with their unique motivations for visiting. The idea that an overwhelming sense of loss for the Pope’s progressive outlook universally motivated these people is absurd on its face.

Let’s consider Emiliano Fernandez, a Catholic from Mexico. He waited in line around midnight, spending hours in the cold, not because he admired Francis’ progressive outlook, but because he had a personal admiration for the Pope, formed during the 2016 visit to Mexico. Let’s not confuse personal admiration with ideological alignment.

We must acknowledge the diversity of motivation behind this mourning. The left claims that it’s solely due to Pope Francis’s progressive outlook, but that’s just not true. Here’s the reality: people’s motivations are complex, nuanced, and rooted in personal experiences and beliefs.

The criticism that Pope Francis faced during his tenure. His pontificate was characterized not only by his concern for the poor and his message of inclusion, but it also sparked discontent among some conservatives who felt alienated by his progressive outlook. This is a fundamental part of his legacy that we shouldn’t conveniently ignore.

In the face of death, people often set aside political and ideological differences to honor the person’s life and legacy. It’s not an endorsement of their views, but a sign of respect for their human dignity and their service. By definition, respect doesn’t necessitate agreement.

In conclusion, let’s not oversimplify the narrative of Pope Francis’s legacy. It’s objectively clear that the large turnout of mourners is a complex tapestry of personal sentiments, not a monolithic endorsement of his progressive outlook. And that’s something the left simply cannot refute.