A controversy that has gripped competitive athletics once again came to the forefront this week in Arlington, Texas, where organizers of the World’s Strongest Woman competition disqualified a competitor after determining that a biological male had competed in the women’s division.
Jammie Booker initially claimed victory in the competition, but officials moved swiftly to reverse the results after learning that Booker is biologically male. The disqualification came after what organizers described as an urgent investigation into the matter.
In a statement, competition officials explained their position with clarity. “It appears that an athlete who is biologically male and who now identifies as female competed in the Women’s Open category. Strongman officials were unaware of this fact ahead of the competition and we have been urgently investigating since being informed.”
The statement continued: “Had we been aware, or had this been declared at any point before or during the competition, this athlete would not have been permitted to compete in the Women’s Open category.”
The situation drew immediate attention from competitors and observers alike. Andrea Thompson, a British competitor and former champion widely respected within the sport, reportedly left the podium expressing frustration with the circumstances. Multiple witnesses indicated Thompson voiced her displeasure with the situation as events unfolded.
Thompson’s coach, Laurence Shahlaei, a former strongman competitor himself, subsequently declared Thompson the legitimate 2025 champion. He noted her performance in key events including the deadlift, log press, and circus dumbbell. In his statement, Shahlaei emphasized a fundamental principle: “Sport is sport. Women’s classes exist for a reason.”
The controversy extended beyond the competition itself. Iron Ape, a sponsor associated with Booker, severed its relationship with the athlete before the official disqualification was announced. The company stated it had “reason to believe” Booker had misrepresented critical information to competition organizers. The company stressed that its decision centered on questions of integrity rather than matters of identity.
This incident represents the latest chapter in an ongoing debate about fairness in women’s athletics. The question of biological males competing in women’s sports has generated considerable discussion across various athletic disciplines, from swimming to track and field to strength competitions.
The core issue remains straightforward: women’s athletic categories were established to provide fair competition among female athletes. When biological males compete in these categories, they typically bring physiological advantages in areas such as muscle mass, bone density, and strength that derive from male puberty and development.
Competition organizers in this instance acted decisively once the facts became clear. Their response suggests that when presented with unambiguous information, athletic organizations can and will enforce rules designed to maintain competitive fairness.
The resolution of this particular controversy offers a measure of clarity in what has often been a contentious debate. The facts of biology, as they pertain to athletic competition, were acknowledged and appropriate action was taken.
As this debate continues across the broader landscape of competitive athletics, the Texas strongman competition stands as an example of what occurs when governing bodies prioritize the integrity of women’s sports categories.
Related: Afghan National Charged in Ambush Attack on Newly Sworn Guard Members
