Melania Trump, First Lady of the United States, has dismissed claims suggesting that her husband, President Donald Trump, is in dispute with Harvard University over the alleged rejection of their son, Barron Trump, from the Ivy League institution.

The First Lady’s spokesperson, Nick Clemens, released a statement to The Palm Beach Post this Tuesday, firmly denying that Barron had applied to Harvard. He has further stated that any claims suggesting Barron, or anyone on his behalf, applied to the university are entirely false.

Speculations regarding the President’s motives ignited last week when he suspended $2.65 billion in grants and attempted to block international students from enrolling at Harvard. This move is currently on hold due to a temporary injunction granted by a judge after Harvard filed a lawsuit against it.

The background to this situation is important. Some observers have suggested that President Trump’s aggression towards Harvard may be rooted not only in the supposed rejection of his youngest son but also in resentment towards former President Barack Obama, whose daughter Malia is a Harvard graduate.

To understand this fully, we should note that last fall, while still on the campaign trail, President Trump announced that his youngest son, Barron, would attend New York University’s Stern School as a business major. The Independent reports that Barron, an Oxbridge Academy graduate, was accepted into many colleges.

This development follows earlier reports that President Trump had initially indicated that his son intended to attend his alma mater, the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, but later decided on NYU.

Trump’s contention with Harvard continued Tuesday when the administration announced plans to cut approximately $100 million in contracts with Harvard as the university continues to resist his demands. This includes a lawsuit Harvard filed last week, accusing the White House of a First Amendment violation after it attempted to dismantle the student visa exchange program.

Both sides of this issue present compelling arguments. Harvard’s legal team has defended its stance, and Harvard President Alan Gerber, in an interview with NPR, encouraged fellow universities to stand firm against any pressure from the Trump administration. He further emphasized the need to “redouble our commitment to the good of the nation and the world.”

In conclusion, this story raises important questions about the relationship between the government and academic institutions. We will keep you informed of any new information if it becomes available.