The United States Supreme Court has declined to review the criminal conviction of Joseph Maldonado-Passage, the central figure in Netflix’s widely viewed documentary series “Tiger King,” who is currently serving a 21-year federal prison sentence for orchestrating a murder-for-hire scheme.
The high court’s decision on Monday represents the latest setback in Maldonado-Passage’s ongoing legal efforts to overturn his conviction. The former exotic animal park operator, who became a household name following the documentary’s release, has maintained his innocence and repeatedly challenged the validity of his trial proceedings.
Maldonado-Passage suffered a significant legal defeat in July when the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected his appeal. Following that ruling, he took to social media to express his frustration with the judicial system’s handling of his case.
“I lost my appeal for a new trial today,” Maldonado-Passage wrote at the time. “The United States Government wants me to die in prison even though they know their witnesses were lying under Oath. In fact, their witnesses all admitted to perjury on world television on season 2 of Tiger King.”
The convicted felon has made multiple public appeals for executive clemency, including direct requests to President Donald Trump for a presidential pardon. Maldonado-Passage has consistently argued that irregularities during his trial warrant a complete review of his case, though federal courts have repeatedly rejected these arguments.
The Supreme Court’s decision to decline review means the lower court’s ruling stands, and Maldonado-Passage will continue serving his sentence in federal custody. The court, as is customary, did not provide an explanation for its decision not to hear the case.
The murder-for-hire conviction stemmed from allegations that Maldonado-Passage attempted to arrange the killing of an animal rights activist who had been critical of his treatment of exotic animals. Federal prosecutors successfully argued their case, leading to his conviction and subsequent lengthy prison sentence.
The case garnered unprecedented public attention following the release of the documentary series, which chronicled the eccentric world of exotic animal ownership and the bitter feuds between various personalities in that community. The cultural phenomenon transformed Maldonado-Passage from an obscure Oklahoma zoo operator into an internationally recognized figure.
Despite his newfound fame, the legal system has remained unmoved by public interest in his case. The Supreme Court receives thousands of petitions annually and accepts only a small fraction for full review, typically selecting cases that present significant constitutional questions or conflicts between lower courts.
With the Supreme Court’s refusal to intervene, Maldonado-Passage has exhausted his primary avenues for judicial relief, leaving executive clemency as his remaining hope for early release from federal custody.
Related: America First Policy Institute Warns States of Major Education Funding Losses
