A conservative legal organization has formally petitioned two federal health agencies to repeal regulations governing organ transplant allocation, arguing that the Biden administration’s policies inject racial considerations into medical decisions that should be based solely on clinical need.
America First Legal, the organization founded by White House aide Stephen Miller, filed the petition with the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The group contends that the Increasing Organ Transplant Access Model, known as IOTA, encourages hospitals to factor race and identity into transplant decision-making under the banner of health equity.
The regulation in question, published in the Federal Register on December 4 and implemented July 1, represents a six-year mandatory payment program affecting selected hospitals across the nation. The program evaluates participating institutions across three domains related to kidney transplantation: achievement, efficiency, and quality. Based on their performance scores, hospitals either receive financial incentives, face monetary penalties, or break even.
The original proposed rule included an explicit equity performance adjustment. That provision was removed before finalization. However, the final regulation incorporates what America First Legal characterizes as a more subtle approach to advancing equity objectives through voluntary health equity plans that participating hospitals are strongly encouraged to complete.
These health equity plans require hospitals to identify health disparities within their patient populations and establish equity goals with quantitative metrics to measure progress in reducing those disparities through specific interventions.
According to the legal group’s analysis, sixty-seven of the one hundred three hospitals mandated to participate in the IOTA Model continue to engage in diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. The organization argues this creates a framework that normalizes identity-based preferences within the organ transplant system.
The petition states plainly that federal regulations cannot invite or normalize discrimination, regardless of the stated intention to improve equity. The group maintains that even though the health equity plans are technically voluntary, their integration into a mandatory federal model effectively encourages hospitals to consider race and identity in transplant allocation decisions.
The nation’s organ transplant system has confronted numerous challenges over the past year, including concerns about patient safety and allocation fairness. This latest controversy adds another dimension to ongoing debates about how medical resources should be distributed and what role, if any, demographic considerations should play in clinical decision-making.
The IOTA Model builds upon earlier payment experiments designed to test whether financial incentives and penalties can improve patient care and expand access for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. The program’s architects intended it to address documented disparities in transplant access and outcomes across different patient populations.
The petition arrives as the current administration reviews numerous Biden-era policies across federal agencies. The outcome of this particular challenge could have significant implications for how hospitals approach organ allocation and whether equity considerations remain part of the federal framework governing transplant medicine.
The matter now rests with federal health officials, who must decide whether to maintain the current regulatory structure or accede to demands for its repeal.
Related: Justice Department Supports Texas Congressional Map in Supreme Court Challenge
