The race for Virginia Attorney General has taken a remarkable turn as Democratic candidate Jay Jones continues to receive substantial financial support from party organizations and major donors, even after revelations that he authored text messages fantasizing about the murder of a Republican leader and his family.
According to campaign finance records published this week by the Virginia Public Access Project, Jones has collected more than one million dollars in donations since the scandal became public on October 3. The disclosure raises questions about Democratic Party priorities as voters prepare to decide who will serve as the Commonwealth’s chief law enforcement officer.
The largest contributor has been DAGA PAC, the political action committee dedicated to electing Democratic attorneys general nationwide. The organization provided approximately three-quarters of Jones’ recent fundraising haul through three separate contributions in the past two weeks: two donations of $250,000 each and an additional expenditure of $230,000.
The Virginia Legislative Black Caucus emerged as the second-largest donor, contributing $50,000 on October 20. Notably, the caucus had also provided $50,000 just one day before the murder text controversy became public knowledge.
Individual donors have also maintained their support. Norfolk attorney Adam Casagrande, who serves as vice president of a Virginia Beach diving supply company that conducts business with the Pentagon, contributed $25,000 to the Jones campaign. Scott Shenker, a California-based donor with a history of supporting Virginia Democrats, matched that amount with his own $25,000 contribution.
The Virginia Eighth District Democratic Committee, representing one of the state’s most reliably Democratic regions encompassing parts of Alexandria and Fairfax, added $30,000 to Jones’ coffers on October 21.
Jones faces Republican incumbent Jason Miyares in what has become one of the most closely watched state-level races in the nation. The contest carries implications beyond Virginia’s borders, as attorney general positions have increasingly become focal points in debates over law enforcement, prosecutorial discretion, and the proper role of state legal officers.
The continued financial support for Jones’ campaign stands in stark contrast to the gravity of the allegations. The text messages in question reportedly contained explicit descriptions of violence against a Republican official and family members. Additionally, Jones faces ongoing scrutiny over a separate reckless driving case that remains under investigation.
Democratic supporters have largely dismissed concerns about the candidate’s past statements. Some have characterized criticism of Jones as manufactured outrage or politically motivated attacks designed to undermine his candidacy.
The funding patterns revealed in the latest disclosure documents suggest that major Democratic organizations have made a calculated decision to stand behind their nominee despite the controversy. Whether Virginia voters will accept this calculation remains to be seen.
The election will serve as a test of voter priorities in a state that has trended increasingly competitive in recent cycles. Virginia has often served as a bellwether for national political trends, making the outcome of this race potentially significant for both parties as they look ahead to future electoral contests.
That is the way the situation stands tonight in Virginia’s attorney general race.
Related: Critical Gaps in Crime Statistics Obscure Immigration Data, Senator Warns Justice Department
