Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Ex Says She Was Pressured to Play Victim, Denies Sex Trafficking

As Sean “Diddy” Combs awaits sentencing in a high-profile case involving allegations of sex trafficking and prostitution, new information has come to light that challenges some of the prosecution’s claims.

Virginia Huynh, a former girlfriend of Mr. Combs who was previously identified as “Victim 3” in the indictment, has submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian. In this correspondence, Ms. Huynh asserts that she was not a victim of sex trafficking or forced prostitution, contrary to the prosecution’s allegations.

Ms. Huynh writes, and I quote, “I told them I was not, but they insisted that I was, even when I expressed my truth otherwise.” She further states that she did not agree with the prosecution’s conclusions and maintains that she was neither trafficked nor engaged in prostitution with Mr. Combs or others.

Also Consider Reading: Nicole Kidman Files for Divorce From Keith Urban After 19 Years Together

Prosecutors had initially planned to call Ms. Huynh as a witness during the trial, but later reported they were unable to reach her. This development follows earlier reports that other witnesses had testified about Ms. Huynh’s relationship with Mr. Combs and alleged incidents of violence.

This new testimony raises important questions about the strength of the prosecution’s case and the nature of the evidence presented during the trial. It should be noted that in July, a jury found Mr. Combs guilty on some charges related to prostitution but acquitted him of the most serious charge of racketeering conspiracy.

As we approach Mr. Combs’ sentencing, scheduled for Friday, both the prosecution and defense have presented their recommendations to the court. Federal prosecutors argue for a sentence of at least 11 years, while Mr. Combs’s attorneys are seeking time served since his arrest in September 2024.

The facts present a complex picture of conflicting testimonies and legal interpretations. As this case continues to unfold, it serves as a reminder of the importance of thorough investigation and the challenges inherent in prosecuting high-profile cases.